CLAIMANT was deliberately deported to prevent her from opposing the adoption of her only son

This is the ‘dot on the i’: CLAIMANT was deliberately deported to prevent her from opposing the adoption of her only son. But the Claimant is a sharp cookie.

While we were collaborating to put our submission before the Court, she found most relevant case law regarding deportation and excessive ‘arbitrary detention’.

The hearing next week was granted to ‘hear the substance of her case’. In bullet language:

  • abuse of power by Barnet Council and HMP Holloway;
  • professional negligence by all lawyers concerned: criminal, prison, immigration;
  • incompetence by court staff: Shoreditch & Clerkenwell and Principal Registry of the Family Division;
  • absence of guidelines for Litigants in Person in prison, especially when imprisoned fraudulently.

Where there is injustice, there has to be publicity. Where family courts are secret, they have to be opened to the glare of publicity. Where prisons close themselves off from scrutiny, they have to be opened that Police can investigate. I had an email for Bernard Hogan-Howe’s office saying

Unfortunately Police cannot just turn up at a prison and hope to interview victims and witnesses.

This was after Melissa was beaten up by staff while supervisors were watching! Who has such ideas? Who gives such orders?

When Police falsify crime statistics, especially child sexual assault, what hope is there???

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “CLAIMANT was deliberately deported to prevent her from opposing the adoption of her only son

  1. Pingback: LEARNING by DOING: Law in Courts and Enforcement in Police and Prison Cells | Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

  2. Pingback: BELINDA’s Latest Call for Battle to Protect Britain’s Children from Paedophilia UK | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  3. Pingback: BACK for CHRISTMAS: Court Hearings in December illustrate how the UK’s ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal | Melissa Laird

  4. Pingback: HMP Cardiff: Paid to be Cruel, Criminal and Torturous? | Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

  5. Pingback: THREE REASONS for Bail: Fabricated Police Forensics, All Clear Brain Scan, Appalling Conditions for Litigant in Person | Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s